Bonds and Tampa: A Formula for Disaster

by Nick Underhill on February 25, 2008

barryrays.jpgForget forgiveness, and all of the other issues, Barry Bonds can still hit a baseball better than 75% of the league.  So why isn’t he heading somewhere south for spring training?  Well, because no one is willing to forgive him for his mistakes.  Eventually, you have to assume that someone will bite the bullet and offer an invitation to camp.  They have too, I mean, you don’t just let a player that is that talented to slip off into the sunset.  Right?

Well, unless he is named Barry Lamar Bonds.  Even if he wasn’t facing possible prison time a lot of teams would be tentative due to all the baggage that comes along with acquiring him.  No one is going to be willing to let this guy have complete control over the clubhouse, there won’t be six lockers set aside for him, there will be no reclining chair, otherwise, if this allowed to occur at his next stop, he will become a cancer.  For this thing to work wherever he may land, he’s going to have to be willing to be just another player.  The records, the ego, all that has to be checked at the door.

That’s why the whole Rays situation boggles my mind.  Everyone says that it’s a perfect fit, but I disagree.  I think that wherever Bonds goes there needs to be some strong veteran leadership in place, you know, guys that can put him in check when his ego gets the best of him.  There has to be someone that can deflect the attention away from his off the field issues when the media has nothing else to report on.  In Tampa Bay he would be the guy, and with all that young talent around his personality could only damage them.

Buster Olney of ESPN is at the forefront of those supporters.  On his ESPN blog he listed four reasons why this is a great destination for Bonds. 

In his first reason he states, “At this point, Bonds might be willing to play for far less than he played for last year, when he earned a base salary of about $17 million – and he would be a natural attendance draw for the Rays.”

I agree with the first part, if Bonds is going to stay in baseball he’s going to have to take the pay cut, he lost his bargaining chip when he got served with perjury charges.  No way can he demand a premium salary, but where we differ is on Bonds being a natural attendance draw.  I’m sorry; I just don’t see people coming out to support this guy, especially in Tampa Bay.  People outside of San Francisco hate him, and the only reason they came out on the road last year because history was looming over every at bat.  Now that he has the record where is the drawing card?  We aren’t talking about Babe Ruth here, we’ve seen more of Bonds than we would like.

The second point was that, “Bonds’ patience at the plate is something that the young and developing hitters could learn from over a long season.”

This is true, watching this guy can only help.  That’s all they’ll get from him though.  I don’t see Bonds taking anyone under his wing and giving them one-on-one lessons.  We are talking about the same guy that decked Jeff Kent for being a good baseball player.  No, seriously.

His third point is where it starts to get crazy.   “In a new place, on a new team, and in a short term situation.  Bonds’ allegedly stifling clubhouse presence might not be any kind of problem.”

Bonds, a good teammate?  Really?  Is Olney being serious?  We are still talking about the same guy here?  All those stories coming out of San Francisco must all be lies then.  Those guys repeatedly saying that it feels like they have new life,  and that, and I quote, “It’s like an anvil has been lifted off of us,” are just exaggerating.  Right Buster?

Then we come back to earth with this, “A lineup with Bonds, who racked up a .480 on-base percentage last year, makes the Rays a better team.”

That’s what this all about anyhow, right?  Like I said before, Bonds is a highly productive player, he just needs to land in the right situation for it all to work.  The question is, what is the right situation?  Stanger things have happened, I mean, Ron Artest put aside all his craziness to make it work in Sacramento.  Randy Moss did it in New England, so it can work.  I just wonder if Tampa is the place, he would just be prolonging his career for the sake it.   It wouldn’t be in pursuit of a ring.  So where is the motivation to be a team player?  If he goes somewhere like either of the New York’s, Boston, Detroit, or Los Angeles, then I can see him sucking it up to get the one thing that has eluded him throughout his career. 

I also don’t see the point on the Rays end, why stunt the growth of your young players when it isn’t going to make enough of a difference to get you into the playoffs?  This whole thing just doesn’t make sense to me.  It certainly isn’t the perfect marriage as Olney paints it out to be.

{ 1 trackback }

Busted Coverage » Daily Dump: Sexy Rexy Back, Pot University, Gay Roommate And How To Argue Like A Girl
02.26.08 at 5:52 am

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Bill B. 02.25.08 at 11:14 pm

I don’t care what kind of personality he has or what kind of a presence he is in the clubhouse. At age 42 last season, with a growing inability to run, he put up a 170 OPS+ (.480 OBP, .565 SLG).

Put him in the Rays’ lineup as a DH and their offense jets from 8th of 14 to about 5th, maybe 4th behind the Yankees, Tigers, Red Sox, and Angels.

Players like Bonds are once-a-generation. If I was the GM of any AL team, I’d jump at the opportunity to sign him.

2 Nick Underhill 02.25.08 at 11:32 pm

Your right on about this. Without him the D-Rays should finish .500. But, be it any other situation I would say sign him. Not for Rays though, with all those youg players he could kill their clubhosue and everything they have been working for. It goes against everything they have been doing. Isn’t this why they got rid of a pair of ultra-talented players? Young and Dukes, in case you haven’t been keeping score. They didn’t want to problems, so why bring in a bigger one?

3 Jake 02.25.08 at 11:34 pm

I don’t care who you are. It’s a bad look to sign a player that cheated the sport and is now looking at goign to prison for it. Excuse me if I’m wrong, but isn’t this even a little unethical, or am I the only one who notices this?

4 Nick Underhill 02.25.08 at 11:38 pm

I’m not saying it is or it isn’t, Jake. It depends on your own personal views, I’m just looking at this from a baseball standpoint, because at some point someone is going to put all those issues aside and decide that this guy could help their team win.

I was hoping it’d be the Cardinals, but again, for the second year, they lost out on the sweepstakes. I don’t like the guy as a person or what he’s done, but as a baseball player, if he can help my team win games, then I’m all for it. Am I morally bankrupt? I don’t know, I seperate the off-field from what happens on the field. It’s the only way to do it. Otherwise, you’ll spend all your time scrutinizing and you’ll never enjoy the sport.

5 Bill B. 02.25.08 at 11:43 pm

If there’s a possibility that Bonds could go to jail, that may be a reason to balk at signing him. But based off of everything I’ve heard, there’s no chance he spends a day in jail.

As Nick knows, I have no problem with athletes using steroids, so I’d have no problem with signing Bonds, or Clemens for that matter.

6 Kenrick Thomas 03.21.08 at 4:22 pm

Bonds should retire, because he’s dealing with enough issues already. He needs to handle his problems with his court issues, and worry about returning to MLB later.

7 Ejay 03.27.08 at 10:30 am

baseball is a game about money, as far as im concerned

8 Ejay 03.27.08 at 10:34 am

baseball is a game about money. as far as im concerned bonds would be an instant boost to attendance regardless of the baggage he brings. what does tampa bay have to look forward to the season? nothing, bonds is a sideshow and everyone loves to stop and stare at a car crash.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>