Put away your black suits and glum faces, this is not a time of mourning. No one will be etching an epitaph into a headstone anytime soon, baseball is alive and well. It was as inevitable as death and taxes, maybe it got out of hand, shoved under the rug for someone else to deal with as the repercussions reached an incurable state, but Barry Bonds was going to be dealt with one way or another. Major League Baseball should have been the ones to deal with their mess, it would have been the honorable thing to do, sort of like how Old Yeller’s owners laid him to rest after he contracted rabies, but never-the-less the situation is finally over.
These are not the last days of an empire. Rome isn’t burning, this is the rebirth of a great sport regressing into purer times. Alert the prophets, the end of the game’s darkest era is among us, the sun can finally shine on all of those honest and forthright. There is only one more prophecy to be fulfilled, and that is the Mitchell Report. We’ve already weathered the storm, we have been for years, these new developments aren’t new at all. As far as the Bonds indictment is irrelevant because all of the information has already been digested by the public and is generally accepted as the truth. In case you need a refresher, what this whole thing is telling us is this: Bonds used steroids he purchased, or obtained through a liaisons acting on his behalf, from BALCO and one Victor Conte.
Isn’t this what everyone wanted? What we’ve been waiting for? I never wanted to see the man facing 30 years in jail, I don’t think anyone did, but if that gives you some solace I don’t blame you. This criminal high-jacked our sacred record books and desecrated the game we love. Maybe, just maybe, we can finally begin the cleansing process. The things Bonds accomplished on the diamond are irreversible, he did what he did and the memories, horrific or otherwise, will forever be etched into our brains. What we can change is the data and, if convicted, we finally have a leg to stand on. If it is proven that he did indeed ‘knowingly’ take the clear why can’t we just erase his name from the record books and act like he never existed? They did it to Chris Webber after it was found that he accepted money while at Michigan, why not do it to Bonds?
A lot of people say this would be a very complicated process but I disagree. Well, as long as you don’t make it one, it’s a simple twofold process. Just leave his name in the box scores, and add a note stating that baseball does not recognize his individual efforts due to rules infractions at the bottom. That’s it, you don’t have to adjust all the pitching statistics or team records like the SABR people have suggested. Then turn Bonds into a ghost in the record books. The single season home run record would go back to Roger Maris. What about Mark McGwire, you ask? As far as I’m concerned he came close enough to admitting his usage so since we are fixing history he gets skipped over. No need to bring the black clouds back around. Then Hank Aaron would be relisted as the all-time king, Babe Ruth would be the walks leader, and so on.
It’s the perfect ending to a nightmare. The sport needs cleansing and this is the way to do it. It would set the right example for America’s youth. How are you supposed to tell your kids that cheaters never win when all they have to do is point a finger at baseball and say ‘what about Barry Bonds’? How do you answer give a proper answer to that question? More importantly, we, as fans, need this. We’re the ones that suffered through all of the awkward moments, not Bonds. How will we be vindicated if he goes to prison? Those feelings from 756 have resurfaced for all of us, now we finally have grounds for removal. Do the right thing.
Even if it doesn’t happen at least we have a new day to hang our hats on. This is truly the first step in the right direction, there will be some backtracking, a few more hero’s will fall, but when it’s all said and done only the righteous will remain. God-willing, one day we will have our clean home run kings. Hopefully sooner rather than later. If somehow Bonds beats this case we have the power to do something about it. Public perception is a hard thing to eclipse, and in the end we hold the power to determine how this man is remembered. If we refuse to acknowledge these accomplishments, then did it really happen?
I never would wish prison time on any man, especially one who has a family that depends on him. Sure, he has all the money in the world and they will be financially secure, but emotionally and developmentally no one should be without a father. Those kids didn’t make those decisions and in the end they will suffer as much as Bonds. They are the ones that will be left to deal with public ridicule and scorn when, or if, he is behind bars. That’s not fair. For something considered a victimless crime, a lot of people are going to suffer.
Possibly the biggest repercussion, guilty or not, will be on his career. I can pretty much guarantee that he will never step foot on a baseball diamond again. Who would be willing to take the risk to sign him while he is in such a state of turmoil? Who in their right mind would be willing to risk their job by offering Bonds a contract? What owner would sign off on it? I don’t care what city you are in, the fans would never accept him as one of their own. The negative outweighs any results he could give you.
How ironic is it that a man that was just trying to get bigger and get some attention has effectively turned himself into a ghost? All he wanted is for people to realize how great he is and it backfired. Now, instead of branding his name into baseball, baseball has branded itself into him. His artifact has been defecated the same way he has defecated the game. Everything he has done has had an equal and opposite reaction on his life. He took the steroids to get bigger, but instead it has made him invisible. He’s already disappeared from the diamond, possibly the record books, and likely from the world as he knows it. Locked away in obscurity while he replaced by more deserving the figures. Every now and then his name will pop up to haunt us like a ghost, but it’s better than having his name in boldface at every book.










{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }
Bud Selig 11.16.07 at 12:08 am
Bring out the cake and candles, Barry is dead!
Mike from the Bay 11.16.07 at 12:10 am
I know your going to call me a homer, but how is this a good thing? It’s never good when the tallest figure in their profession is crumbled due to illegal activity. It’s not a good look to the outsides. Was it good when Enron was finally exposed? It’s never good when things like this happen.
Nick Underhill 11.16.07 at 12:11 am
Mike,
It is good for the sport though. The dirty secret was ousted from the shadows a long time ago. Now we can finally say, look, we might not be perfect but progress is being made. As far as Enron, I think it was a good thing, because in that situation, and this one, the people stopped getting screwed!
Jesus Melendez 11.16.07 at 11:37 am
Unfortunately, this indictment doesn’t mean Bonds took steroids…it means he MIGHT have perjured himself.
It’s kinda like when Al Capone got sent to jail for “tax evasion”. They couldn’t prove he killed anyone (kinda like Selig piss poor efforts in outing Bonds as a steroids user)…but they put him away!
Nick Underhill 11.16.07 at 6:47 pm
But, it does in a way. To prove he perjured himself they have to prove that he knowlingly took steroids, namely the clear, to do so.
Huh? 11.18.07 at 1:24 am
Jesus how does this not prove that bonds used roids? That is, allegedly used roids? If congress finds him guilty of perjury it is because he lied to the grand jury about using the clear. he said he never knowingly used it, stating that he throught it was flaxseed oil or something. so if he is convicted it is because they have concrete evidence that he lied under oath, thus meaning they have to prove he used to the substance in question to get a conviction. If this happens it would give baseball would have the grounds to take disciplinary action, meaning that they could make a case for his dismissal from the game, record books, or otherwise. It would be heard to eradicate his name from the record books, but I would love to see it happen.
Huh? 11.18.07 at 1:28 am
Yeah, the above post is littered with type-o’s and poor grammar, I apologize. But, I suggest that anyone that doesn’t understand what is happening, or wants to get a better grip on it, reads the game of shadows. Since it’s release almost everyone that was named has went down for the same things that are described. It’s like a hit list. Now with everything that happened with bonds the words ring even truer. At first I doubted the authenticity and questioned if the accounts were embellished or the testimonies of their sources were twisted to further an agenda against Bonds and the others, but now I see that my skepticism was unwarranted and unnecessary
Jesus Melendez 11.18.07 at 7:13 pm
Huh?
Last part first. To suggest that Bonds be erased from the record books is asinine. Jason Giambi ADMITTED to taking steroids and his stats are still being accumulated. Rafael Palmeiro had a positive steroids test and there he is…still high up ll-time hits and home runs list.
Now, the indictment means that they have evidence enough to bring Bonds to trial. It by NO MEANS means that he is guilty…that is for the jury to decide.
Next, there is no evidence that any HGH or steroids (or whatever Bonds did or didn’t take) actullay did help his numbers. You have to look at this with an unbiased eye.
If Bonds DID use something…he never failed a drug test, NOR did he (potentially) use anything that was (at the time) on a “banned” list.
So…why remove his numbers? Maybe you ban him from the sport or alienate him from the Hall of Fame…but remove his numbers?
That would just be the end result of the witch hunt that this is/was.
Remind me again…is Pete Rose still the all-time hit king? Is his managerial record still in tact?
Yeah…thought so.
Nick Underhill 11.18.07 at 9:03 pm
It’s the same logic behind having two home run kings for a single season. The star next to Roger Maris’ name basically removed him from the record books. Removing him was a theoretical statement, don’t read too much into it, basically it should be noted next to his name everytime that he took steroids if he is convicted. Who knows what the Mitchel report will unveil, so until then I’ll stick a pin in it.
The Pete Rose thing is completely different, how does his hits record get comprimised at all for betting on baseball after his playing career? Those are completley different statements, and unrelated. If you can connect them, please do so, because it is completely over my head.
Jesus, your my boy, and you know I respect your thoughts and opinions, but I guess we are going to have to disagree here.
I agree that removing Bonds from the record book is a little extreme, I jumped off the handle a little bit and went too far, but the fact remains that this situation has to be fixed if he is found guilty.
Jesus Melendez 11.18.07 at 10:25 pm
Exactly…”if he is found guilty”. Right now, he has only been indicted. Kinda like how you can’t call OJ Simpson a “double murderer”.
Show me where he was convicted.
And you’re right…I’ll digress. No one ever accused Rose of betting as a player, but, is it THAT unfounded to think that he didn’t just ALL OF A SUDDEN started once he bacame a manager full-time and gambled on games as a player? I mean he was a player/manager before he was a full-time manager.
So, should his managerial record have an asterisk by it?
And maybe Rose WAS a stretch…but what about Shoeless Joe Jackson?
Perhaps Jackson isn’t relevant since his stats aren’t chart toppers. The fact remains, however, that he was found guilty and banned from the game because he (UNLIKE Bonds) broke the rules of baseball.
And since you brought up the Maris asterisk…I can side with that mark of indistinction more than a Bonds asterisk believe it or not. But…I’d say that Ruth deserves the asterisk. No sense blemishing the mark of a guy (Maris) that plays the amount of games that the modern day player plays (162)…you have to denote the stats of the person who played the number of games that is LESS than standard.
Make sense?
Nick Underhill 11.18.07 at 11:17 pm
I thought I made it clear that this was in reference to the indictment and all of that. That it was if he was found guilty, if he is sentenced to 30 years in prison, if, if, if… Sorry if it wasn’t clear. Which is fine, at htis point it’s irrelevant because everyone knows what is happening.
About Rose. The difference is, IF he was gambling on games while he was a player it only fueled him to get 4,000 hits. He was still playing on the same playing field as everyone else without the aid of some substance that fueled him artificially. Rose’s managerial record should not be tainted because it has been found that he never bet against his team. So he was playing to win everyone night, probably more so that any other manager. Especially in April, when people are just getting back into the swing of things. It is well known that Rose was a gambler, the asterisk basically places itself, but it is not needed.
Look, Bonds did break the rules. He said he never knowingly took steroids. Just like Marion Jones never knowingly took steroids, and Gary Sheffield, and everyone else associated with Balco. They were coached to say so, or they were told look, we are going to make you a better player, don’t ask what you are taking you will never fail a drug test, etc.
You have to think that congress has enough on him to convict him to put him away. They wouldn’t risk the embarassment of doing so if they only had word of mouth type evidence. At this point you have to think that Anderson snitched on him, seeing as how he got out of prison the day the indictment came in, but we will have to wait and see.
As far as the star on Ruth’s name, come on. Let’s get serious. If anything he was at a disadvantage, and at the time his record was the norm, which is why the Maris record would get starred up. It was sign of disrespect, in Ruth’s case it would be a sign of respect because he had less time to get to 60. Let’s not take it out of context.
Nick Underhill 11.18.07 at 11:22 pm
Jesus, the whole OJ thing is hilarious though. You can’t call OJ a double murderer, but it’s ok for him to write a book called If I did it. I just find that ironic, because Bonds never knowingly took the clear, but if he did take something that was the clear, he thought it was flaxseed oil. I guess we’ll have to wait and see, and agree to disagree until a verdict comes in.
Huh? 11.19.07 at 11:33 pm
Sounds like to me that Barry Lamar Bonds was on the juice.
The DOJ’s entire case hinges on the ridiculous question of whether Bonds “knowingly” was on the juice, or lied on the witness stand when he said he took such substances “unknowingly.” The actual indictment parses in language that would shame a Clinton. It reads, “During the criminal investigation, evidence was obtained including positive tests for the presence of anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing substances
for Bonds.
Jesus Melendez 11.20.07 at 2:42 am
Huh?
Check out what I had to say over at the Hall of Very Good. I’m curious to see what your opinion is regarding Bonds’ legacy.
bronxilla 11.26.07 at 4:16 pm
Bonds has created a conundrum out which we will never emerge. Even if a jury finds him innocent, the court of public opinion has already rendered its judgment. Unfortunately, that judgment is also divided. So we will be left with people believing that he used steroids but it doesn’t matter because a) they don’t really help your performance or b) when he used them they were not banned (so how could he have cheated); others will believe he used them and feel that radical measures such as Nick’s should hold, or that the records should employ asterisks freely, or that Bond’s stats should be adjusted to reflect a steroid-free career. But none of this will matter because in the end we will all lack the purity that we all seek from our game, that the game was played fair and square from beginning to end, that accomplishments are not marred by facts or rumors of cheating, that careers were made and built out of mental commitment and fortitude, and pure physical prowess.
On my blog I wrote about one of the overlooked aspects of the steroids scandal: Assume that steroids do improve performance. How many times did a juiced at bat give an unfair advantage to a team? On how many occasions did warning track power become a game winning home run? How many times did a short fly out become a long fly out that drove in a go ahead run? Of course, the answers to these questions can never be found. And that’s the point. Because the “cheating” involved is as masked as can be, and it’s mixed in with all the nuances and intricacies that involve the team game of baseball, we will never find the smoking gun that can then be used to reconstruct the past.
How much of this has to do with changed morals? Who knows? But if the Bonds saga were a remake of Chariots of Fire, there would be a dramatic scene where Bonds would be sitting in his locker room, looking at his vial of flaxseed/clear or whatever it was, considering the ramifications of even appearing to cheat, and then tossing it into the trash and walking out into field triumphantly. What we’ll have instead is endless punditry on ESPN and Court TV. Stay tuned, or not.